Tech giants Microsoft, Google and xAI say they will allow the United States federal government access to their new artificial intelligence models for national security testing. The Center for AI Standards and Innovation (CAISI) at the Department of Commerce announced the agreement on Tuesday amid increasing concerns about the capabilities that Anthropic's newly unveiled Mythos model could give hackers. The agreement fulfils a pledge the administration of US President Donald Trump made in July to partner with technology companies to vet their AI models for "national security risks". Microsoft will work with US government scientists to test AI systems "in ways that probe unexpected behaviors", the company said in a statement. Together they will develop shared data sets and workflows for testing the company's models, the company said.

A federal review of new AI models ahead of their public release is being considered as a possible power for that committee, according to the publication's sources. No clear approach has been decided, but the suggested it could mimic what's currently happening within the UK government, where multiple layers of oversight confirm that AI models meet safety standards. There's also still a chance the entire concept fizzles and comes to nothing. If an oversight group is created, it would mark quite a reversal from the hands-off attitude presented in the White House's previously introduced AI Action Plan. The plan appeared willing to offer the AI companies most of the concessions they wanted, although it did leave a lot of potential to create plenty of new problems .

Data-driven operations management often relies on parameters estimated from costly human-generated labels. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) and other AI systems offer inexpensive auxiliary data, but introduce a new challenge: AI outputs are not direct observations of the target outcomes, but could involve high-dimensional representations with complex and unknown relationships to human labels. Conventional methods leverage AI predictions as direct proxies for true labels, which can be inefficient or unreliable when this relationship is weak or misspecified. We propose Generative Augmented Inference (GAI), a general framework that incorporates AI-generated outputs as informative features for estimating models of human-labeled outcomes. GAI uses an orthogonal moment construction that enables consistent estimation and valid inference with flexible, nonparametric relationship between LLM-generated outputs and human labels. We establish asymptotic normality and show a "safe default" property: relative to human-data-only estimators, GAI weakly improves estimation efficiency under arbitrary auxiliary signals and yields strict gains whenever the auxiliary information is predictive. Empirically, GAI outperforms benchmarks across diverse settings. In conjoint analysis with weak auxiliary signals, GAI reduces estimation error by about 50% and lowers human labeling requirements by over 75%. In retail pricing, where all methods access the same auxiliary inputs, GAI consistently outperforms alternative estimators, highlighting the value of its construction rather than differences in information. In health insurance choice, it cuts labeling requirements by over 90% while maintaining decision accuracy. Across applications, GAI improves confidence interval coverage without inflating width. Overall, GAI provides a principled and scalable approach to integrating AI-generated information.

Dr. David Blackwell was a mathematician and statistician of the first rank, whose contributions to statistical theory, game theory, and decision theory predated many of the algorithmic breakthroughs that define modern artificial intelligence. This survey examines three of his most consequential theoretical results the Rao Blackwell theorem, the Blackwell Approachability theorem, and the Blackwell Informativeness theorem (comparison of experiments) and traces their direct influence on contemporary AI and machine learning. We show that these results, developed primarily in the 1940s and 1950s, remain technically live across modern subfields including Markov Chain Monte Carlo inference, autonomous mobile robot navigation (SLAM), generative model training, no-regret online learning, reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), large language model alignment, and information design. NVIDIAs 2024 decision to name their flagship GPU architecture (Blackwell) provides vivid testament to his enduring relevance. We also document an emerging frontier: explicit Rao Blackwellized variance reduction in LLM RLHF pipelines, recently proposed but not yet standard practice. Together, Blackwell theorems form a unified framework addressing information compression, sequential decision making under uncertainty, and the comparison of information sources precisely the problems at the core of modern AI.

Multi-view data analysis seeks to integrate multiple representations of the same samples in order to recover a coherent low-dimensional structure. Classical approaches often rely on feature concatenation or explicit alignment assumptions, which become restrictive under heterogeneous geometries or nonlinear distortions. In this work, we propose two geometry-aware multi-view embedding strategies grounded in Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) optimal transport. The first, termed Mean-GWMDS, aggregates view-specific relational information by averaging distance matrices and applying GW-based multidimensional scaling to obtain a representative embedding. The second strategy, referred to as Multi-GWMDS, adopts a selection-based paradigm in which multiple geometry-consistent candidate embeddings are generated via GW-based alignment and a representative embedding is selected. Experiments on synthetic manifolds and real-world datasets show that the proposed methods effectively preserve intrinsic relational structure across views. These results highlight GW-based approaches as a flexible and principled framework for multi-view representation learning.

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a central framework for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. Despite its practical success, RLHF raises fundamental statistical questions because it relies on noisy, subjective, and often heterogeneous feedback to learn reward models and optimize policies. This survey provides a statistical perspective on RLHF, focusing primarily on the LLM alignment setting. We introduce the main components of RLHF, including supervised fine-tuning, reward modeling, and policy optimization, and relate them to familiar statistical ideas such as Bradley-Terry-Luce (BTL) model, latent utility estimation, active learning, experimental design, and uncertainty quantification. We review methods for learning reward functions from pairwise preference data and for optimizing policies through both two-stage RLHF pipelines and emerging one-stage approaches such as direct preference optimization. We further discuss recent extensions including reinforcement learning from AI feedback, inference-time algorithms, and reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards, as well as benchmark datasets, evaluation protocols, and open-source frameworks that support RLHF research. We conclude by highlighting open challenges in RLHF. An accompanying GitHub demo https://github.com/Pangpang-Liu/RLHF_demo illustrates key components of the RLHF pipeline.

We review recently proposed Bayesian approaches for clustering high-dimensional data. After identifying the main limitations of available approaches, we introduce an alternative framework based on vertical consensus inference (VCI) to mitigate the curse of dimensionality in high-dimensional Bayesian clustering. VCI builds on the idea of consensus Monte Carlo by dividing the data into multiple shards (smaller subsets of variables), performing posterior inference on each shard, and then combining the shard-level posteriors to obtain a consensus posterior. The key distinction is that VCI splits the data vertically, producing vertical shards that retain the same number of observations but have lower dimensionality. We use an entropic regularized Wasserstein barycenter to define a consensus posterior. The shard-specific barycenter weights are constructed to favor shards that provide meaningful partitions, distinct from a trivial single cluster or all singleton clusters, favoring balanced cluster sizes and precise shard-specific posterior random partitions. We show that VCI can be interpreted as a variational approximation to the posterior under a hierarchical model with a generalized Bayes prior. For relatively low-dimensional problems, experiments suggest that VCI closely approximates inference based on clustering the entire multivariate data. For high-dimensional data and in the presence of many noninformative dimensions, VCI introduces a new framework for model-based and principled inference on random partitions. Although our focus here is on random partitions, VCI can be applied to any dimension-independent parameters and serves as a bridge to emerging areas in statistics such as consensus Monte Carlo, optimal transport, variational inference, and generalized Bayes.

Computational topology provides a tool, persistent homology, to extract quantitative descriptors from structured objects (images, graphs, point clouds, etc). These descriptors can then be involved in optimization problems, typically as a way to incorporate topological priors or to regularize machine learning models. This is usually achieved by minimizing adequate, topologically-informed losses based on these descriptors, which, in turn, naturally raises theoretical and practical questions about the possibility of optimizing such loss functions using gradient-based algorithms. This has been an active research field in the topological data analysis community over the last decade, and various techniques have been developed to enable optimization of persistence-based loss functions with gradient descent schemes. This survey presents the current state of this field, covering its theoretical foundations, the algorithmic aspects, and showcasing practical uses in several applications. It includes a detailed introduction to persistence theory and, as such, aims at being accessible to mathematicians and data scientists newcomers to the field. It is accompanied by an open-source library which implements the different approaches covered in this survey, providing a convenient playground for researchers to get familiar with the field.

We study the problem of detecting local geometry in random graphs. We introduce a model $\mathcal{G}(n, p, d, k)$, where a hidden community of average size $k$ has edges drawn as a random geometric graph on $\mathbb{S}^{d-1}$, while all remaining edges follow the Erdős--Rényi model $\mathcal{G}(n, p)$. The random geometric graph is generated by thresholding inner products of latent vectors on $\mathbb{S}^{d-1}$, with each edge having marginal probability equal to $p$. This implies that $\mathcal{G}(n, p, d, k)$ and $\mathcal{G}(n, p)$ are indistinguishable at the level of the marginals, and the signal lies entirely in the edge dependencies induced by the local geometry. We investigate both the information-theoretic and computational limits of detection. On the information-theoretic side, our upper bounds follow from three tests based on signed triangle counts: a global test, a scan test, and a constrained scan test; our lower bounds follow from two complementary methods: truncated second moment via Wishart--GOE comparison, and tensorization of KL divergence. These results together settle the detection threshold at $d = \widetildeΘ(k^2 \vee k^6/n^3)$ for fixed $p$, and extend the state-of-the-art bounds from the full model (i.e., $k = n$) for vanishing $p$. On the computational side, we identify a computational--statistical gap and provide evidence via the low-degree polynomial framework, as well as the suboptimality of signed cycle counts of length $\ell \geq 4$.

Autocorrelation is a defining characteristic of time-series data, where each observation is statistically dependent on its predecessors. In the context of deep time-series forecasting, autocorrelation arises in both the input history and the label sequences, presenting two central research challenges: (1) designing neural architectures that model autocorrelation in history sequences, and (2) devising learning objectives that model autocorrelation in label sequences. Recent studies have made strides in tackling these challenges, but a systematic survey examining both aspects remains lacking. To bridge this gap, this paper provides a comprehensive review of deep time-series forecasting from the perspective of autocorrelation modeling. In contrast to existing surveys, this work makes two distinctive contributions. First, it proposes a novel taxonomy that encompasses recent literature on both model architectures and learning objectives -- whereas prior surveys neglect or inadequately discuss the latter aspect. Second, it offers a thorough analysis of the motivations, insights, and progression of the surveyed literature from a unified, autocorrelation-centric perspective, providing a holistic overview of the evolution of deep time-series forecasting. The full list of papers and resources is available at https://github.com/Master-PLC/Awesome-TSF-Papers.